Interdisciplinary paraseismic conception and rehabilitation of the cultural heritage in urban areas

Leave 3 lines above. Title of the paper, name (s) and affiliation (s) must be centered.
Hugues Martin, Engineer Architect, Full Professor,
Polytechnical University of Mons (Belgium)

Abstract
English version of the abstract, 12 lines max, 3 cm of margins from left and right. Left 2 lines above each paragraph.
Since 1991, specialists of safeguarding and rehabilitation of the heritage and old sites at the natural risks, and more precisely at the seismic risks, met in a network, component of group PACT of the European Federation of networks (F.E.R.) placed under the aegis of the Council of Europe. This component, gathers geophysicists, geologists, engineers of structure, engineers of the building and the architects, all professors of universities, schools of architecture or researchers who come from Italy, France and Greece and other countries. Among the activities of the network (course, researches,  expertises, seminars - workshops of summer of sensitising in Europe brought together, since 1994, students and professors around 9 cases of studies, nine seminars which organised work in formative conferences followed by a work of ground under the angle of the taking into account of the risks, of the evaluation of the degrees of vulnerability, the urban and architectural mitigations.

Sommario
Greek (or on the language of author) version of the abstract, 12 lines max, 3 cm of margins from left and right. Left 2 lines above each paragraph.
Dal 1991, specialisti della salvagurdia e riabilitazione, etc., etc., .....………………………….

1.   The case study of Colmars les Alpes
The full paper must be no more than 8 pages. You must number the paragraphs. Leave 2 lines above each paragraph.
As an example, let us examine the case of the workshop hold in Colmars-le –Alpes in 2000.
For its 7th seminar-workshop of summer, Pact 19 undertook, from the 10 to July 16 2000, the study of the village of Colmars les Alpes (Alpes de Haute Provence). 
Etc, etc.……………………………………………………………………………………….

2.   The case study of Athens
The full paper must be no more than 8 pages. You must number the paragraphs. Leave 2 lines above each paragraph.
1.1   Possible sub-paragraph
No lines above each sub-paragraph………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

THE MAIN AIMS ABOUT  BOOKLET OF THE BUILDING

1) to know

2) to foresee

3) to plan

4) to prevent

5) to check

Fig. 1. The illustrations (pictures, diagrams, etc.) must be cited and inserted in the text, they also must be numbered. Leave  3 spaces above and below the illustration.

5.   Conclusions
In conclusion, it appears completely obvious that the initial challenge to inform, make people sensitive to and make work on a real case of study, with about thirty students of different countries and "cultures" is not as insane as it appears to with it in first approach. From initial formations very varied which are spread out, for the paraseismic  one, since knowledge zero until the control of the tools of modeling and calculations by finite elements of buildings subjected to dynamic stresses, in particular seismic, starting from approaches of the rehabilitation and the restoration which are distributed since the absolute respect of the history and the old techniques until the contemporary interventions boldest, we have to notice that the alloy takes in some days under the pressure of the work on site and the responsibilization of the students in front of at a real demand of the local population. 

References (leave 2 spaces above; the references must be cited in the text only with the corresponding number indicated above)
[1] G. GIALLOCOSTA, “La concezione sistemica in architettura: esperienze e contributi fondativi di area tecnologica”, contributo al ciclo di seminari DR Approccio Sistemico e Architettura at Milan Polytechnic, 2005.
[2] M. CUOMO, “Il fascicolo del fabbricato, Carta d’integrità”, in riv. COSTRUIRE n° 266 lug/ago, pagg. 20/24, Milan, 2005.
[3] M. REJNA, “L’informazione tecnica sulla durabilità e manutenibilità dei componenti edilizi”, in dispense BEST Politecnico di Milano mod. 17 Master M.D.M.B.P., 2004.
[4] P. N. MAGGI, “Tipologie manutentive e strategie di manutenzione”, Dispense BEST mod. 19 (M.D.M.B.P.), Milan, 2004.
[5] C. MOLINARI e S. CROCE, “La qualità edilizia nel tempo”, Quaderni del manuale di progettazione edilizia, Collana Qualità e Manutenzione, Ed. Hoepli, Milan, 2003.
[6] AA. VV., “Manual HAPM Component life AL, E. & FN SPON”, London – Glasgow - New York – Tokyo – Melbourne - Madras, 2000.